Impact of COVID-19 on cancer incidence, presentation, diagnosis, treatment and survival in Northern Ireland.

The COVID-19 pandemic had a major impact on cancer patients and services but has been difficult to quantify. We examined how the entire cancer pathway-from incidence, presentation, diagnosis, stage, treatment and survival-was affected in Northern Ireland during April-December 2020 compared to equivalent 2018-2019 periods using retrospective, observational cancer registry data from the Northern Ireland Cancer Registry (NICR). There were 6748 cancer cases in April-December 2020 and an average 7724 patients in April-December 2018-2019. Incident cases decreased by 13% (almost 1000). Significant differences were found across age cohorts and deprivation quintiles, with reductions greatest for younger people (<55 years; 19% decrease) and less deprived (22% decrease). A higher proportion had emergency admission (16%-to-20%) with lower proportions diagnosed pathologically (85%-to-83%). There was a significant stage shift, with lower proportions of early stage (29%-to-25%) and higher late-stage (21%-to-23%). Lower proportions received surgery (41%-to-38%) and radiotherapy (24%-to-22%) with a higher proportion not receiving treatment (29%-to-33%). One-year observed-survival decreased from 73.7% to 69.8% and 1-year net-survival decreased from 76.1% to 72.9%, with differences driven by five tumours; Lung (40.3%-to-35.0%), Head-and-Neck (77.4%-to-68.4%), Oesophageal (53.5%-to-42.3%), Lymphoma (81.1%-to-75.2%) and Uterine cancer (87.4%-to-80.4%). Our study reveals profound adverse impact of COVID-19 on the entire cancer patient pathway, with 13% fewer cases, greater emergency admissions and significant stage-shift from early to more advanced-stage disease. There was major treatment impact with lower rates of surgery and radiotherapy and higher proportions receiving no treatment. There were significant reductions in 1-year survival. Our study will support service recovery and protect cancer services in future pandemics or disruptions.

Impact of COVID-19 control on lung, breast, and colorectal pathological cancer diagnoses. A comparison between the Netherlands, Aotearoa New Zealand, and Northern Ireland.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic was managed in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) by a COVID-19 elimination policy, involving border closure and an initial national lockdown. This was different to most other countries including Northern Ireland (NI) and the Netherlands (NED). We quantify the effect of these policies on the diagnosis of three major cancers, comparing NZ with these two European countries. METHOD: Data from NED, NZ and NI population-based cancer registries were used to assess trends in all pathologically diagnosed (PD) lung, breast, and colorectal cancers from March to December 2020 (pandemic period) and compared to the similar pre-pandemic period (2017-2019). Trend data were also collated on COVID-19 cases and deaths per 100,000 in each population. RESULTS: Comparing the pre-pandemic period to the pandemic period there were statistically significant reductions in numbers of lung (↓23%) and colorectal (↓15%) PD cancers in NI and numbers of breast (↓18%) and colorectal cancer (↓18.5%) diagnosed in the NED. In NZ there was no significant change in the number of lung (↑10%) or breast cancers (↑0.2%) but a statistically significant increase in numbers of colorectal cancer diagnosed (↑5%). CONCLUSION: The impact of COVID-19 on cancer services was mitigated in NZ as services continued as usual reflecting minimal healthcare disruption and protected cancer services linked with the elimination approach adopted. The reduction in PD cases diagnosed in NED and NI were linked with higher COVID-19 rates and reflect societal restrictions which resulted in delayed patient presentation to primary and secondary care, disruption to screening and healthcare services as a result of COVID-19 infections on staff and the need to shift intensive care to COVID-19 patients. Reductions in PD cancers in NI and the NED and in particularly lung cancers in NI, highlight the need for targeted public health campaigns to identify and treat 'missing' patients. Protecting cancer services should be a priority in any future pandemic or systemic healthcare system disruption.

Decision regret after primary hip and knee replacement surgery.

BACKGROUND: Decision regret (DR) is a recognised patient centered outcome measure following a therapeutic intervention. This study aimed to measure DR following primary total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA), to assess for differences between these patients and explore possible contributory factors. METHOD: DR was measured using the DR scale in a group of THA and TKA patients, between February 2017 and December 2018, who had made a decision to have joint replacement surgery within the previous year and were able to reflect on their outcomes. RESULTS: On analysis a significantly greater proportion of TKA patients reported moderate or severe (Mod/Sev) DR [17.1% (56/328)] compared to THA patients [4.8% (18/376)]. Conversely, a significantly reduced proportion of TKA patients reported having No DR [42.1% (138/328)] compared to THA patients [66.7% (251/376)]. On multivariate logistic regression analysis joint replacement type (TKA/THA) and change in Oxford score were significant predictors of DR with gender, age, BMI and ASA grade not significantly associated. TKA patients were more than twice as likely to have Mod/Sev DR compared THA patients (Odds Ratio = 2.33 (95% CI 1.24-4.39)). Patients with poorer improvements in pain and function 1-year post-operatively (measured by Oxford scores) reported greater levels of DR. CONCLUSION: TKA patients were significantly more likely to report greater levels of DR 1-year following surgery compared to THA patients. For both TKA and THA patients, greater levels of DR were associated with poorer Oxford scores. The use of decision aids to reduce post-operative DR in joint replacement patients should be examined especially for knee replacement patients.

Identifying pre-existing conditions and multimorbidity patterns associated with in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19.

We investigated the association between a wide range of comorbidities and COVID-19 in-hospital mortality and assessed the influence of multi morbidity on the risk of COVID-19-related death using a large, regional cohort of 6036 hospitalized patients. This retrospective cohort study was conducted using Patient Administration System Admissions and Discharges data. The International Classification of Diseases 10th edition (ICD-10) diagnosis codes were used to identify common comorbidities and the outcome measure. Individuals with lymphoma (odds ratio [OR], 2.78;95% CI,1.64-4.74), metastatic cancer (OR, 2.17; 95% CI,1.25-3.77), solid tumour without metastasis (OR, 1.67; 95% CI,1.16-2.41), liver disease (OR: 2.50, 95% CI,1.53-4.07), congestive heart failure (OR, 1.69; 95% CI,1.32-2.15), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR, 1.43; 95% CI,1.18-1.72), obesity (OR, 5.28; 95% CI,2.92-9.52), renal disease (OR, 1.81; 95% CI,1.51-2.19), and dementia (OR, 1.44; 95% CI,1.17-1.76) were at increased risk of COVID-19 mortality. Asthma was associated with a lower risk of death compared to non-asthma controls (OR, 0.60; 95% CI,0.42-0.86). Individuals with two (OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.47-2.20; P < 0.001), and three or more comorbidities (OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.43-2.27; P < 0.001) were at increasingly higher risk of death when compared to those with no underlying conditions. Furthermore, multi morbidity patterns were analysed by identifying clusters of conditions in hospitalised COVID-19 patients using k-mode clustering, an unsupervised machine learning technique. Six patient clusters were identified, with recognisable co-occurrences of COVID-19 with different combinations of diseases, namely, cardiovascular (100%) and renal (15.6%) diseases in patient Cluster 1; mental and neurological disorders (100%) with metabolic and endocrine diseases (19.3%) in patient Cluster 2; respiratory (100%) and cardiovascular (15.0%) diseases in patient Cluster 3, cancer (5.9%) with genitourinary (9.0%) as well as metabolic and endocrine diseases (9.6%) in patient Cluster 4; metabolic and endocrine diseases (100%) and cardiovascular diseases (69.1%) in patient Cluster 5; mental and neurological disorders (100%) with cardiovascular diseases (100%) in patient Cluster 6. The highest mortality of 29.4% was reported in Cluster 6.

Foot drop following primary total hip arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Foot drop is a potentially debilitating complication following injury to the sciatic nerve during primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of this study was to determine the incidence, risk factors and outcome of this complication within one large surgical practice. METHODS: We analysed the records of 10,624 primary THAs carried out between January 1993 and November 2017 using a posterior approach. All were under the care of the senior author. RESULTS: Overall, there were 47 cases (0.44%) of foot drop, but over time the incidence dropped from 0.6% to 0.3% (p = 0.033). Preoperative protrusio acetabulae (p < 0.001), female sex (p < 0.001) and junior grade of surgeon (p < 0.009) were all significant risk factors. In this series, dysplasia was not a risk factor. 1 year postoperatively, 25 (53.2%) had complete recovery, 12 (25.5%) had ongoing sensory deficit but normal power, and 10 (21.3%) had a residual sensory-motor deficit. CONCLUSION: Take home message:- In this series, protrusio acetabulae, female sex and junior grade of surgeon were significant risk factors for foot drop following primary THA.

Quality of life among symptomatic compared to PSA-detected prostate cancer survivors - results from a UK wide patient-reported outcomes study.

BACKGROUND: Quality of life among prostate cancer survivors varies by socio-demographic factors and treatment type received; however, less in known about differences in functional outcomes by method of presentation. We investigate differences in reported urinary, bowel, sexual and hormone-related problems between symptomatic and PSA-detected prostate cancer survivors. METHODS: A UK wide cross-sectional postal survey of prostate cancer survivors conducted 18-42 months post-diagnosis. Questions were included on presentation method and treatment. Functional outcome was determined using the EPIC-26 questionnaire. Reported outcomes were compared for symptomatic and PSA-detected survivors using ANOVA and multivariable log-linear regression. RESULTS: Thirty-five thousand eight hundred twenty-three men responded (response rate: 60.8%). Of these, 31.3% reported presenting via PSA test and 59.7% symptomatically. In multivariable analysis, symptomatic men reported more difficulty with urinary incontinence (Adjusted mean ratio (AMR): 0.96, 95% CI: 0.96-0.97), urinary irritation (AMR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.95-0.96), bowel function (AMR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.97-0.98), sexual function (AMR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.88-0.92), and vitality/hormonal function (AMR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.96-0.96) than PSA-detected men. Differences were consistent across respondents of differing age, stage, Gleason score and treatment type. CONCLUSION: Prostate cancer survivors presenting symptomatically report poorer functional outcomes than PSA-detected survivors. Differences were not explained by socio-demographic or clinical factors. Clinicians should be aware that men presenting with symptoms are more likely to report functional difficulties after prostate cancer treatment and may need additional aftercare if these difficulties persist. Method of presentation should be considered as a covariate in patient-reported outcome studies of prostate cancer.

No difference in gait kinematics or kinetics between limbs in bilateral total hip replacement patients at long-term follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies report that gait parameters of patients following total hip replacement improve from pre-operative levels, although in most cases do not reach those of normal subjects. However, studies are generally of unilateral total hip replacement patients at short-term follow-up. There have been no reports of 3D gait kinematics and kinetics in patients with bilateral total hip replacements at long-term follow-up. The aim of this study was to compare temporospatial parameters and 3D lower limb gait kinematics and kinetics at long-term follow-up between limbs and against controls for patients who have undergone staged bilateral total hip replacement. METHODS: 3D gait analysis was performed on 13 patients who had undergone bilateral total hip replacement, at an average follow-up of 10.1 (first hip) and 9.3 years (second hip), and a normal elderly control group comprising 10 subjects. FINDINGS: Knee flexion/extension range of motion was marginally greater in Hip 2 (p = 0.049) compared to Hip 1 by 3.2°. There were no other significant differences in temporospatial parameters or a range of lower limb kinematics or kinetics between the first and second operated hip. Multiple gait parameters were significantly worse for both hips compared to age-matched normal individuals. INTERPRETATION: Although symmetrical biomechanical recovery was achieved, significant gait deficiencies remain in both hips compared to normal controls. These deficits may provide targets for enhanced rehabilitation programs.

Long-term hip loading in unilateral total hip replacement patients is no different between limbs or compared to healthy controls at similar walking speeds.

Variation in hip joint contact forces directly influences the performance of total hip replacements (THRs). Measurement and calculation of contact forces in THR patients has been limited by small sample sizes, wide variation in patient and surgical factors, and short-term follow-up. This study hypothesised that, at long-term follow-up, unilateral THR patients have similar calculated hip contact forces compared to controls walking at similar (self-selected) speeds and, in contrast, THR patients walking at slower (self-selected) speeds have reduced hip contact forces. It was further hypothesised that there is no difference in calculated hip contact forces between operated and non-operated limbs at long-term follow-up for both faster and slower patients. Gait analysis data for THR patients walking at faster (walking speed: 1.29 ±â€¯0.12 m/s; n = 11) and slower (walking speed: 0.72 ±â€¯0.09 m/s; n = 11) speeds were used. Healthy subjects constituted the control group (walking speed: 1.36 ±â€¯0.12 m/s; n = 10). Hip contact forces were calculated using static optimisation. There was no significant difference (p > 0.31) in hip contact forces between faster and control groups. Conversely, force was reduced at heel strike by 19% (p = 0.002), toe-off by 31% (p < 0.001) and increased at mid-stance by 15% (p = 0.02) for the slower group compared to controls. There were no differences between operated and non-operated limbs for the slower group or the faster group, suggesting good biomechanical recovery at long-term follow-up. Loading, at different walking speeds, presented here can improve the relevance of preclinical testing methods.

Factors influencing job loss and early retirement in working men with prostate cancer-findings from the population-based Life After Prostate Cancer Diagnosis (LAPCD) study.

PURPOSE: To investigate factors associated with job loss and early retirement in men diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa) 18-42 months previously. METHODS: Men ≤ 60 years at diagnosis who completed the Life After Prostate Cancer Diagnosis (LAPCD) survey were identified. Men who moved from employment at diagnosis to unemployment (EtoU) or retirement (EtoR) at survey (18-42 months post-diagnosis) were compared to men remaining in employment (EtoE). Sociodemographic, clinical and patient-reported factors were analysed in univariable and multivariable analysis. RESULTS: There were 3218 men (81.4%) in the EtoE, 245 (6.2%) in EtoU and 450 (11.4%) in the EtoR groups. Men with stage IV disease (OR = 4.7 95% CI 3.1-7.0, relative to stage I/II) and reporting moderate/big bowel (OR = 2.5, 95% CI 1.6-3.9) or urinary problems (OR = 2.0, 95% CI 1.4-3.0) had greater odds of becoming unemployed. Other clinical (≥ 1 comorbidities, symptomatic at diagnosis) and sociodemographic (higher deprivation, divorced/separated), living in Scotland or Northern Ireland (NI)) factors were predictors of becoming unemployed. Men who were older, from NI, with stage IV disease and with caring responsibilities had greater odds of retiring early. Self-employed and non-white men had lesser odds of retiring early. CONCLUSION: PCa survivors who retire early following diagnosis do not report worse urinary or bowel problems compared to men remaining in employment. However, we identified clinical and sociodemographic factors which increased unemployment risk in PCa survivors. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Targeted support and engagement with PCa survivors at risk of unemployment, including their families and employers, is needed.

Postdischarge Unscheduled Care Burden After Lower Limb Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: In contrast to postdischarge arthroplasty readmission rates, the unscheduled reattendance burden to primary care is under-reported. Understanding reasons for reattendance would allow for implementation of strategies to reduce this burden. The present study aims to quantify the out-of-hours (OOH) general practitioner and emergency department (ED) service reattendance burden and readmission rate after primary total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty, with estimation of the associated costs. METHODS: This is a prospective consecutive cohort study. A prospective audit of all total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty patients in 2016 in a single high-volume UK arthroplasty unit was performed. Incidence and reasons for reattendance to OOH and ED service, as well as readmission rates, at both 30 and 90 days following discharge are reported. A multivariate analysis was performed to determine patient characteristics, which results in increased reattendance and readmission rates. RESULTS: A total of 2351 procedures resulted in 374 attendances of OOH service and 665 to ED with a total estimated cost of £190,000 within 90 days. The readmission rate was 6.8%. Risk factors for reattendance and readmission were increasing age and a prolonged length of stay. The use of a 5-day postdischarge phone call and a dedicated Arthroplasty Care Practitioner favors reduced reattendances but not the readmission rate, with the additional benefit of being cost-effective. CONCLUSION: The postdischarge arthroplasty reattendance burden is associated with significant costs, and strategies to reduce this should be developed. Further research is required to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of multicomponent strategies to reduce reattendance operating at scale.

The £ for lb. Challenge. Evaluation of a novel, workplace-based peer-led weight management programme, 2014-2016.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the £ for lb. Challenge, a novel country-wide, workplace-based, peer-led weight management programme with participants from a range of private and public organisations in Northern Ireland. STUDY DESIGN: Pre- and post-intervention studies. METHODS: The intervention was workplace-based, led by volunteer co-worker champions and based on the NHS Choices 12-week weight loss guide which incorporates dietary advice, physical activity, behaviour change methods and weekly weight monitoring. It operated from January to April in three consecutive years (2014-16). Overweight and obese adult workers were eligible. Training of peer champions involved two half-day workshops delivered by dieticians and physical activity professionals. Employers and/or participants pledged £1 to charity for every pound of weight lost. Weight was reported at enrolment and at either 12 weeks (2014) or at 12 weekly intervals (2015-16). Changes in weight and % weight, and body mass index were determined for all the participants and for gender and deprivation subgroups. RESULTS: There were 734, 1559 and 1513 eligible participants, and 21, 31 and 35 participating companies in 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively. Engagement rates were 94% and 96% and completion rates were 70% and 71% in 2015 and 2016, respectively. Mean weight loss was 1.9 kg (2.2%; 2014), 2.5 kg (2.8%; 2015) and 2.4 kg (2.7%; 2016). The proportions losing ≥5% initial bodyweight were 21% (2014), 24% (2015) and 26% (2016). Male participants were more than twice as likely as women to complete the programme (odds ratio: 2.5 [2015]; 2.2 [2016]) and to lose ≥5% bodyweight (odds ratio: 2.5 [2015]; 3.7 [2016]). CONCLUSIONS: The £ for lb. Challenge was an effective, low-cost health improvement intervention with meaningful weight loss for many participants, particularly male workers. With high levels of engagement and ownership, and successful collaboration between public health, voluntary bodies, private companies and public organisations, it is a novel workplace-based model with potential to expand.

Gait kinetics of total hip replacement patients-A large scale, long-term follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: It is not known if lower limb gait kinetics of total hip replacement (THR) patients reach normal levels at long term follow-up post-operatively. METHODS: Three-dimensional gait analysis was performed on 134 THR patients with identical implants 10-years post-operatively. Lower limb moments and powers were compared between different age strata (54-64 years, 65-69 years, 70-74 years, 75-79 years and over 80 years) and a normal elderly control group. RESULTS: Hip extensor moment and hip power generation were significantly reduced in all age groups compared to normal. External hip rotation moment was significantly reduced in all age groups, apart from the youngest group, compared to normal. However, in contrast to previous short term follow-up studies there was no significant difference in hip abduction moment between any of the age groups and the normal group. CONCLUSION: This large cohort study shows that, at long term follow-up following THR, some hip joint kinetics (hip extensor and external rotation moments and hip power generation) do not reach normal levels, but that peak abduction moment is preserved. THR patients recovery could potentially benefit from intensive rehabilitation focusing on hip extension and external rotation in the post-operative, and perhaps preoperative, period.

Non-visualized aorta in abdominal aortic aneurysm screening: Screening outcomes and the influence of subject and programme characteristics.

Objectives To compare abdominal aortic aneurysm screening outcomes of men with non-visualized aorta at original scan with subsequent scans and to determine predictors of non-visualized aorta. Methods In the Northern Ireland Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm screening programme, outcomes (discharge, annual surveillance, three-monthly surveillance, or vascular referral) and patient and programme characteristics (age, deprivation quintile, family history, technician experience, and screening location) for men with non-visualized aorta were investigated at original scan, and first and second rescans. Results Non-visualized aorta proportions were 2.9, 11.4, and 4.7% at original, first, and second rescan, respectively. There were no differences in screening outcomes between scanning stages (98.4, 97.6, and 97.4% <3 cm). There were 42 men (0.13%) with aortas ≥5.5 cm at original scan, but none at first and second rescan. A significantly greater proportion with non-visualized aorta were from more deprived (5.0%) than less deprived areas (1.7%). Deprivation quintile and staff role were significant independent non-visualized aorta predictors at original scan, and staff role at first rescan. Men from less deprived areas were three times as likely to have aortas visualized than those from more deprived areas (OR = 3.0, CI = 2.4-3.8) at original scan. A man scanned by screening technician compared with lead sonographer was 51% less likely to have aorta visualized at original scan and 94% less likely at first rescan. Conclusions The risk of abdominal aortic aneurysm in men with non-visualized aorta on first or subsequent rescans is no more than for those with visualized aorta on original scanning. Men from deprived areas are much more likely to have non-visualized aorta at original scan.

Gait analysis and hip extensor function early post total hip replacement.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to systematically evaluate the sagittal kinematic and kinetic gait patterns in patients in this early post-operative period, to describe them and to better understand the deficiencies in that gait pattern that may help to develop targeted rehabilitation strategies. METHODS: This study evaluated early gait patterns in 10 patients with isolated unilateral hip osteoarthritis who were post-operative for total hip replacement. Kinetic and kinematic assessments - focusing on sagittal plane abnormalities - were performed at 2 weeks pre-operatively and 8 weeks post-operatively. RESULTS: Our results demonstrated that while clinical scoring for pain and functional ability significantly improved post-operatively, as did clinical assessment of range of motion passively, this did not translate to the degree of dynamic improvement in gait. Step length and stride length did not improve significantly. Lack of hip extension in terminal stance associated with excessive anterior pelvic tilt persisted and was associated with a worsening in hip extensor power post-operatively. CONCLUSION: Based on our results, post-operative rehabilitation programmes should include extensor muscle exercises to increase power and to retain the operative gain in passive range of motion, which would help to improve gait patterns.

Do demographic and socio-economic characteristics of women with epilepsy influence contact with joint obstetric/neurology services in Northern Ireland?: Women with epilepsy and joint obstetric/neurology services.

PURPOSE: Care of pregnant women with epilepsy (WWE) should be shared between an epilepsy specialist and obstetrician. Joint care is provided by the regional, but not peripheral, maternity units in Northern Ireland (NI). We investigated whether demographic and socio-economic factors influenced access of joint obstetric/neurology services. METHOD: Data on WWE delivering between 1st January 2012 and 31st December 2014 were collected. Demographic (age, parity, Trust residence) and socio-economic (employment status, deprivation level) factors were compared between three groups: (1) women delivering at the regional unit from its catchment, (2) women delivering at the regional unit from outside its catchment and (3) women delivering at peripheral units. RESULTS: 447 WWE delivered in the 3-year period. 48% (214/447) and 52% (233/447) delivered at regional and peripheral units respectively. 42% delivering at the regional unit were from its catchment and 58% outside. There was no difference in parity, employment status or deprivation of WWE from outside the regional unit catchment who accessed joint services and those who did not. Trust residence was the strongest predictor of delivery location with women from adjacent Trusts over 90% less likely to deliver at peripheral units. Maternal age was also a predictor of delivery location with a woman aged 30 being 50% less likely to deliver at a peripheral unit than one aged 20. CONCLUSIONS: 52% of all WWE and 63% outside the regional unit catchment do not access the joint service. Service models which deliver improved access should focus on those in geographically distant locations and of younger age.

Peri-operative visual loss following total knee arthroplasty - A case report: Visual loss following TKA.

Perioperative visual loss (POVL) following non-ocular surgery is a rare but significant complication. This report describes a case of ischaemic optic neuropathy following total knee arthroplasty which resulted in permanent blindness.

The influence of area level social deprivation on preoperative disease severity and postoperative outcomes following unicompartmental knee joint replacement.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the effect of socioeconomic deprivation on preoperative disease and outcome following unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). METHODS: 307 Oxford UKRs implanted between 2008 and 2013 under the care of one surgeon using the same surgical technique were analysed. Deprivation was quantified using the Northern Ireland Multiple Deprivation Measure. Preoperative disease severity and postoperative outcome were measured using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS). RESULTS: There was no difference in preoperative OKS between deprivation groups. Preoperative knee range of motion (ROM) was significantly reduced in more deprived patients with 10° less ROM than least deprived patients. Postoperatively there was no difference in OKS improvement between deprivation groups (p=0.46), with improvements of 19.5 and 21.0 units in the most and least deprived groups respectively. There was no significant association between deprivation and OKS improvement on unadjusted or adjusted analysis. Preoperative OKS, Short Form 12 mental component score and length of stay were significant independent predictors of OKS improvement. A significantly lower proportion of the most deprived group (15%) reported being able to walk an unlimited distance compared to the least deprived group (41%) one year postoperatively. CONCLUSION: More deprived patients can achieve similar improvements in OKS to less deprived patients following UKR.